So, are they any good? The Birmingham Post one is not bad at all. A manageable roster of seven bloggers means you get regular postings across a wide range of subjects and the posts themselves tend to be fairly high quality and in depth. It's still early days but I can see this developing into a neat little group blog for Birmingham that isn't too dependent on the parent newspaper. One to watch.
The Birmingham Mail one, on the other hand, is pretty dire. It appears to reproduce the opinion columns from the paper and so has that really annoying one-sentence-per-paragraph preaching tabloid style where there's no room for debate or discussion. (At least I hope it's just reprinting - I'd hate to think someone would blog in that style willingly.) It's almost interesting how it grates with the rest of the internet, but not interesting enough to justify the blogs existence. One to avoid.
They both use Movable Type which is nice to see but for some reason they've stuck with the default template which, frankly, is awful. I appreciate this is probably a trial and they don't have the budget for a designer but some better colours would be nice. Good that they have full RSS feeds though.
2 Comments:
Shame the full feeds are so badly formatted though! No line break in my bloglines feed :(
Thanks for pointing them out though!
It's odd, sometimes they come out okay, sometimes not. I'd be intrigued to see what the templates look like. (God, that came out really geeky...)
There's also an rss 2.0 feed but it just has summaries.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home